Upon our departure for India, I had one image in my mind: long, uninterrupted days of baking bread and playing with Zazie.
Baking works out sometimes. The truth is, things are going to turn out only so well because we have a toaster oven. Still, I keep trying. This morning, however, while sifting ingredients to make buttermilk biscuits, I found many weevils in the flour, microscopic wheat colored worms. At first I thought it was some leftover unprocessed flour or rice grains. Then they started to move. This must be the reason so many cereals and flours in India have warnings that read: transfer product to airtight container to avoid infestation. This was last of the five kilos of flour, not the first: two loaves of bread, yeast rolls, two batches of pizza dough, flour tortillas, three batches of fruit muffins, cream scones, maybe more. Cowboys used to chase their weevils with a shot of vodka. After this morning, I kind of feel like I need a drink.
In the same time that it took to bake up five kilos of flour, something likewise appeared in the belly of my child. She turned into liquid will, pure aggravated humanity. There is no issue too small to make her ignite into flames; no detail too insignificant to push the full force of her being into the pits of hell. Her eyes hollow out and she speaks in tongues. The lights flicker. This morning I thought, could it be the weevils? Were tiny grain grubs sifting through her blood, turning her into the devil-baby at Hull House?
Jane Addams suggested that the devil-baby myth appeared to tame “recalcitrant husbands and fathers.” As if inventing mythical domestic punishments was the only salve to “subdue the fiercenesses of the world” that surrounded powerless mothers and wives against prurient mates. But, Vik always brings his pay envelope home unopened and appears to be tempted only by golden age comic books and diet pepsi.
Because his mother dreamed of strawberries when she was pregnant, the hero of Henry Fielding’s 1742 novel Joseph Andrews, is born with a strawberry shaped birthmark. In the 17th and 18th centuries, maternal imagination, not paternal indiscretions, was believed to be so strong that, when pregnant, a woman’s mind, longings, dreams and imaginations “marked” the child in the womb.
Lately, I have been wondering what my maternity might have bore as I dreamt while pregnant. Maybe I dreamed of a world where shoelaces are always different lengths or where soap melts faster than it can be turned into plastic whale food or where my glass of water is always too big or too small. Perhaps it was a chimera of toys that are always missing the last crucial piece, the phantoms of blocks that just will not stack, or maybe, just maybe, a bogeyman that always picks exactly the wrong shirt. Did my dreams--my maternal hallucinations--mark my child? Is this my punishment for eating nothing but french fries and lemonade for nine months straight? Did I watch too much experimental film? What is going on? Why didn’t anyone warn me? When will it end?
The limited utility of the Gender Lens
1 month ago